site stats

Petersen v maintenance officer case summary

http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAFSHC/2024/225.html WebThe Maintenance Act 99 of 1998 (enforcement of maintenance orders) Bannatyne vs Bannatyne F:- After divorce, father accepted to pay maintenance & keep children on his …

Mortensen V Peters PDF Statutory Interpretation Jurisdiction

Web3. feb 2011 · PETERSEN v. ASTRUE United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Feb 3, 2011 Subsequent References CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) PETERSEN v. ASTRUE Important Paras As this case intimately involves the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), we begin with a brief description of that provision. Weba) Facts of the case: This case is about the father of a child who was born with cerebral palsy after his pregnantmother was involved in a car accident while the baby was still in a … liam casey flagship https://arcoo2010.com

Cases - Pietersen V Maintenance Officer [2004] 1 All SA 117

Web24. feb 2024 · The relevant case is Petersen v Maintenance Officer Simon’s Town Maintenance Court and Others 2004 2 SA 56 (C) 381. DID YOU ALSO KNOW: Advocate Muhammad Abduroaf was an advocate in a an important constitutional case. This was where the Cape High Court confirmed the extensive powers of the Maintenance Court, … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2003/61.html WebThe plaintiff Petersen brought this action to recover possession of a tractor which was in possession of the defendant Thompson who claimed to own it. Both men claimed ownership by purchase from J.I. Case Credit Corporation. The court tried the case without a jury and when plaintiff rested granted defendant's motion for a nonsuit. liam carty newcastle

CASE Summaries Chapters 4-16 - CASES CH 4 - 16 Schnaar v

Category:D v S (CA&R86/17) [2024] ZANCHC 53 (11 May 2024)

Tags:Petersen v maintenance officer case summary

Petersen v maintenance officer case summary

Petersen v Maintenance Officer and Others (6541/03) …

Web2. jún 2008 · Summary In Petersen v. Union Pacific Railroad, 567 F.Supp.2d 1043, 1051 (C.D.Ill.2008), two witnesses stated that the railroad's crossing warning system was not working properly, although the event recorder data stated that it was. Summary of this case from Ill. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Young See 1 Summary Opinion No. 06-3084. June 2, 2008. Web11. okt 2024 · The Procedure Your application is urgent and therefore it is done on affidavit and not orally in Court. You may, however, be called to give oral evidence if the Judge so wishes. This is to clarify certain issues. However, this can mostly be avoided if your papers are properly drafted.

Petersen v maintenance officer case summary

Did you know?

Web1. dec 2008 · 1. This case relates to the untimely and brutal death of music icon Abdul Mutaliep Petersen, better known as Taliep Petersen. The first accused was his wife. The other three accused are men she allegedly solicited to assist in causing her husband's death. WebPetersen v Maintenance Office (2004) = the decision in Motan was rejected and held to be unconstitutional on the ground that it violated the extra-marital child’s right not to be …

Web27. okt 2016 · The trouble for Officer Petersen is that despite his legal arguments, he knew all of the following facts at the time of the search: Marc and Denise Boyer were separated and nearly divorced; Marc was the only resident of the home on Wilson Street, and Denise lived at a separate residence on the "corner of Spruce and Vine" Streets; Marc "did not … Web26. feb 2016 · The facts of the case are as follows: The testator left the residue of his estate to his daughter and to the first generation “wat by datum van dood in die lewe is”. The …

Web29. nov 2024 · Summary: Contempt of court – Shifren-principle in maintenance matters where minors involved – evaluation of applications for contempt of court orders in maintenance matters JUDGMENT I CONTEXT [1] The case revolves, at its core, around the financial maintenance and care of a minor child. [1] WebFacts: A single mother (the applicant), received inadequate maintenance contributions from the father of the extra-marital child, launched an application for an order directing the …

Web1. júl 1994 · In Petersen v. Rogers, 337 N.C. 397, 445 S.E.2d 901, our Supreme Court held "absent a finding that [natural] parents (i) are unfit or (ii) have neglected the welfare of their children, the constitutionally-protected paramount right of parents to custody, care, and control of their children must prevail." Summary of this case from Price v. Howard

WebMaintenance Cases Petersen v Maintenance Officer and others (2004) 1 All SA 117 (C) Main Issue: Maintenance/paternal grandparent’s duty to an enquiry to pay maintenance … mcfarland \\u0026 companyWeb7. okt 2024 · Case Summary. On 10/07/2024 Petersen filed a Civil Right ... #2 Exhibit B - Delta Air Lines, Inc.'s Answer to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Challenge to Judicial Officer, #4 Exhibit D - April 12, 2024 Minute Order, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Case Reassignment, #6 Exhibit F - Defendant Jesse Rhodes' Answer to Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - June 2, 2024 ... liam casleyWebPETERSEN v MAINTENANCE OFFICER, SIMON'S TOWN MAINTENANCE COURT, AND OTHERS 2004 (2) SA 56 (C) 2004 (2) SA p56 Citation 2004 (2) SA 56 (C) Case No … mcfarland trucking seaman ohioliam cassidy göppingenWeb20. dec 1996 · Facts of the Case: Petersen In 1989, Gary W. Petersen began receiving massage therapy at the Gatekey health center in Anchorage. One of the therapists who treated Petersen was R.H., an apprentice therapist at the health center. Eventually, Petersen chose R.H. as his exclusive massage therapist. liam challenor iadtWebPetersen v Maintenance Officer and others [2004] 1 All SA 117 (C) Division: Cape of Good Hope Provincial Division Date: 11 November 2003. Case No: 6541/03 Before: Fourie J. … liam casey scotrailWebPetersen v Maintenance officer, Simon’s Town Maintenance Court and Others 2004 (2) SA 56 (C): The court recognized that paternal grandparents actually have a duty of support … liam cashman