Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013
Webb19 dec. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Because Martinez-Nataren has not shown that he is entitled to asylum, he cannot establish that he meets the higher standard for withholding for removal. See Majd v. … WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 413 (5th Cir. 2013). The person must support the claim with“specific, detailed facts showing a good reason to fear that he or she will be . singled …
Sharma v. holder 729 f.3d 407 5th cir. 2013
Did you know?
Webb12 okt. 2024 · See Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412-13 (5th Cir. 2013). Rather, the IJ found Katembo was targeted because of his occupation as an election worker. Next, although Katembo testified at his hearing that he was targeted because of his work with CENI, IJ determined based on his asylum the Webb4 aug. 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Under the substantial evidence standard, this court may not reverse a factual finding unless the evidence “compels” such a reversal—i.e., the evidence must be “so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude against it.” Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 536–37 (5th Cir. …
Webb3 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). Regarding the credibility issue, an adverse credibility determination is a factual finding. Singh v. Sessions, 880 … WebbSharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 412 (5th Cir. 2013) Nexus/One Central Reason Matter of C-T-L-, 25 I&N Dec. 341 (BIA 2010) CAT Framework Garcia v. Holder, 756 F.3d 885, 891 …
WebbHolder, 562 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2009) Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit March 4, 2009 Also cited by 407 other opinions 1 reference to Carbajal-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 78 F.3d 194 … Webb12 juli 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A)). ... This case is distinguishable from Sharma in which we held that the IJ's finding—affirmed by the BIA—that the petitioner failed to prove that he was persecuted on account of his political opinion was not supported by substantial evidence.
Webb20 jan. 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and … only one exceptionWebbHolder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). We review the factual findings, including whether an alien is entitled to asylum, for substantial evidence, and will reverse only if the record … inward transactionWebb26 apr. 2016 · Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir.2013). II. Petitioner argues that the BIA erred in denying him withholding of removal by rejecting his claim that, because of his reporting of the criminal activity of which he was a victim, he would be threatened with persecution in Mexico based on his “membership in a particular social group [ ] or … only one dollar storeWebb28 mars 2024 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A)). The burden is on the applicant to present “specific, detailed facts” to … only one earbud has soundWebb27 okt. 2024 · 938 F.3d at 232; see also Suate-Orellana v. Barr, 979 F.3d 1056, 1061 (5th Cir. 2024) ; Orellana-Monson v. Holder, 685 F.3d 511, 521–22 (5th Cir. 2012). The same is true here. Substantial evidence supports the BIA's conclusion that her group is neither particularized nor distinct. onlyonee_toniWebb10 juni 2014 · Sharma v. Holder, 729 F.3d 407 , 411 (5th Cir. 2013). The primary thrust of Malm's petition is that the BIA erred in determining that he was ineligible for cancellation … only one earth theme sloganWebb30 aug. 2013 · Holder , 729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i) ). It may not be "incidental, tangential, or subordinate to another reason … only one discount applied